Removable media device stolen from Educational Credit Management Corp.'s (ECMC) headquarters contained Social Security numbers, names, addresses, dates of birth of people who had received federal student loans
A removable media device containing personal data on 3.3 million people was stolen from the Minnesota headquarters of federal student loan guarantor Educational Credit Management Corp. (ECMC) last week -- and the data should never have been copied onto the device in the first place.
ECMC, which handles and insures more than $11 billion worth of student loans for the U.S. Department of Education, discovered on March 23 that the device had been stolen. The firm is currently in the process of sending letters to all of the affected loan recipients, some of whom date back to as long as 15 years ago. Their names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and dates of birth were on the stolen device, but no bank account or financial data, according to ECMC.
David Hawn, chief business development officer for ECMC, said in an interview that storing such sensitive data on a removable device was a "very clear violation of our company policies and protocols." He would not specify whether the device was a USB stick, hard drive, or other type of device due to the sensitive nature of the ongoing investigation by law enforcement. Hawn also was not able to reveal whether the data was encrypted, either.
"This situation was unfortunate in that it had a human element to it...It really was a disappointment to all of us that this had occurred," Hawn says, and the company is in the process of doing a full-blown review of its internal security policies and plans to "make changes."
"We unfortunately learned about this the hard way, and we are working diligently to shore that up," he says. "Our systems security infrastructure is very robust, and in fact since this incident occurred, by way of precaution we have hired an external agency to perform various penetration tests on our firewalls -- all the testing has been negative."
Hawn says it doesn't appear the thief or thieves were targeting specific information in the crime. "There's nothing to suggest that they were aware of what they were taking," Hawn says.
And thus far, ECMC says there's been no evidence of any abuse of the data. The company is offering the affected victims free credit monitoring and reporting with Experian.
ECMC's problem isn't unique: Ipswitch File Transfer will release a study tomorrow that shows that 90 percent of IT and security professionals use thumb drives or external devices to move data. Few companies bother encrypting data on those devices, either, says Frank Kenney, vice president of global strategy at Ipswitch. "Encryption generally doesn't happen. It's rare," Kenney says.
"We were shocked by how many people are using [these devices] to share or move large files," Kenney says.
The data potentially exposed includes existing, ongoing, and older, inactive federal student loans as well, ECMC's Hawn says. "It did include, for archival purposes, a number of records" that date back to 15 years ago, he says.
ECMC serves as the guarantor for loans in Oregon, Virginia, and Connecticut, but borrowers in all states could be affected by the breach, according to one published report.
Potential victims of the breach can go to this page set up by ECMC to get more information on whether they are affected, and if so, what to do. darkreading.com
Showing posts with label Data Breach. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Data Breach. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
JC Penney tried to block publication of data breach
IDG News Service - Retailer JC Penney fought to keep its name secret during court proceedings related to the largest breach of credit card data on record, according to documents unsealed on Monday.
JC Penney was among the retailers targeted by Albert Gonzalez's ring of hackers, which managed to steal more than 130 million credit card numbers from payment processor Heartland Payment Systems and others. Gonzalez was sentenced to 20 years in prison on Friday in U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
In December, JC Penney -- referred to as "Company A" in court documents -- argued in a filing that the attacks occurred more than two years ago, and that disclosure would cause "confusion and alarm."
However, it was already suspected JC Penney was one of the retailers after the Web site StorefrontBacktalk was the first outlet to accurately report in August 2009 that JC Penney was among the retailers targeted by Gonzalez's group.
New Jersey, where the Gonzalez case started, agreed to keep JC Penney's identity secret but the case was moved to Massachusetts where authorities decided otherwise, prompting JC Penney's motion.
Disclosing Company A's identity "may discourage other victims of cybercrimes to report the criminal activity or cooperate with enforcement officials for fear of the retribution and reputational damage that may arise from a policy of disclosure as espoused by the government in this case," wrote JC Penney attorney Michael D. Ricciuti.
In a Jan. 12 filing, U.S. prosecutors argued for disclosure. "Most people want to know when their credit or debit card numbers have been put at risk, not simply if, and after, they have clearly been stolen," the government wrote. "The presumption of disclosure has an additional significant benefit, though, besides the right of the card holder to know when he has been exposed to risk."
The U.S. Secret Service had told JC Penney that its computer system had been broken into. The retailer's system had "unquestionably failed," but the government said the Secret Service did not have evident that payment card numbers were stolen, U.S. prosecutors wrote.
Another retailer, The Wet Seal, said in a statement issued Monday that it had also been targeted by Gonzalez's gang around May 2008. The Wet Seal has been referred to as "Company B" in court documents.
"We found no evidence to indicate that any customer credit or debit card data or other personally identifiable information was taken," the company said.
Other retailers affected by the breach included TJX, 7-Eleven, Hannaford Brothers, Dave & Busters, BJ's Wholesale Club, OfficeMax, Boston Market, Barnes & Noble, Sports Authority, Forever 21 and DSW. computerworld.com
JC Penney was among the retailers targeted by Albert Gonzalez's ring of hackers, which managed to steal more than 130 million credit card numbers from payment processor Heartland Payment Systems and others. Gonzalez was sentenced to 20 years in prison on Friday in U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
In December, JC Penney -- referred to as "Company A" in court documents -- argued in a filing that the attacks occurred more than two years ago, and that disclosure would cause "confusion and alarm."
However, it was already suspected JC Penney was one of the retailers after the Web site StorefrontBacktalk was the first outlet to accurately report in August 2009 that JC Penney was among the retailers targeted by Gonzalez's group.
New Jersey, where the Gonzalez case started, agreed to keep JC Penney's identity secret but the case was moved to Massachusetts where authorities decided otherwise, prompting JC Penney's motion.
Disclosing Company A's identity "may discourage other victims of cybercrimes to report the criminal activity or cooperate with enforcement officials for fear of the retribution and reputational damage that may arise from a policy of disclosure as espoused by the government in this case," wrote JC Penney attorney Michael D. Ricciuti.
In a Jan. 12 filing, U.S. prosecutors argued for disclosure. "Most people want to know when their credit or debit card numbers have been put at risk, not simply if, and after, they have clearly been stolen," the government wrote. "The presumption of disclosure has an additional significant benefit, though, besides the right of the card holder to know when he has been exposed to risk."
The U.S. Secret Service had told JC Penney that its computer system had been broken into. The retailer's system had "unquestionably failed," but the government said the Secret Service did not have evident that payment card numbers were stolen, U.S. prosecutors wrote.
Another retailer, The Wet Seal, said in a statement issued Monday that it had also been targeted by Gonzalez's gang around May 2008. The Wet Seal has been referred to as "Company B" in court documents.
"We found no evidence to indicate that any customer credit or debit card data or other personally identifiable information was taken," the company said.
Other retailers affected by the breach included TJX, 7-Eleven, Hannaford Brothers, Dave & Busters, BJ's Wholesale Club, OfficeMax, Boston Market, Barnes & Noble, Sports Authority, Forever 21 and DSW. computerworld.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


